United States v. Gabriel Infanti and Nathan Kurtz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no violation of right to speedy trial even though defendant asserted his right within 172 months after indictment
• chronology similar to that in instant case; claim under Eules rejected because not raised below
• denial of motion to dismiss affirmed; one judgment of conviction affirmed, one reversed on other grounds
• no speedy trial violation from 28-month delay even though defendant alleged that two witnesses critical to his case had died
• no violation of defendant’s right to a speedy trial even though defendant alleged that two witnesses critical to his case had died, prosecution witnesses’ memories had lapsed, and records allegedly critical to defendant’s case had been destroyed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).