United States v. G. Martin Wynn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, “[t]o establish a scheme to defraud, the government must prove that the defendant ] acted with the specific intent to defraud”
• emphasizing that, in the absence of a clear directive, and where neither the Supreme Court nor this Court has spoken directly on an issue, “the issue has not been resolved plainly”
• explaining that scheme to defraud necessarily’ requires proof of intent to defraud
• setting forth elements of § 1920 offense
• setting forth elements of wire fraud offense
• identifying elements of mail fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).