United States v. Furst, Sidney D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court erred in admitting bank statements in the bank’s possession under Rule 803(6) “to the extent the statements contained any data other than confirmations of transactions” with the bank
• explaining that a conviction underS 664 requires a showing that the plan is covered by ERISA
• providing as a definition for recuse: \to disqualify (oneself) as judge in a particular case\
• finding harm “entirely speculative” where defendant limited the scope of his direct examination of witnesses to avoid government’s possible improper cross-examination of witnesses
• analyzing trustworthiness of relevant documents found in bank files
• judge suggests that he desires guilty plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).