Skip to main content
· 7/16/1991

United States v. Funds Held in the Names or for Benefit of Wetterer

Citations

  • 138 F.R.D. 356
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15821
  • 1991 WL 171168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to dismiss a plaintiff's complaint when it would be \relatively pointless\ because it would not bar the plaintiff's claim and simply require the plaintiff to \refile and re-serve [the] defendant\
  • denying a motion to dismiss where service was one day late due to a calculation error by the plaintiff's attorney, and dismissal was considered \relatively pointless\ because the claim would not be time- barred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orenstein, Spatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.