· 7/16/1991
United States v. Funds Held in the Names or for Benefit of Wetterer
Citations
- 138 F.R.D. 356
- 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15821
- 1991 WL 171168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to dismiss a plaintiff's complaint when it would be \relatively pointless\ because it would not bar the plaintiff's claim and simply require the plaintiff to \refile and re-serve [the] defendant\
- denying a motion to dismiss where service was one day late due to a calculation error by the plaintiff's attorney, and dismissal was considered \relatively pointless\ because the claim would not be time- barred
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orenstein, Spatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.