United States v. Frencher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a district court’s credibility determination made after holding “a hearing on the merits of a motion to suppress is virtually unassailable on appeal” (quotation omitted)
• “A credibility determination made by a district court after a hearing on the merits of a motion to suppress is ‘virtually unassailable on appeal.’” (quoting United States v. Guel-Contreras, 468 F.3d 517, 521 (8th Cir. 2006))
• “A credibility determination made by a district court after a hearing on the merits of a motion to suppress is ‘virtually unassailable on appeal.’” (quoting United States v. Guel-Contreras, 468 F.3d 517, 521 (8th Cir. 2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).