United States v. Freeman
Citations
- 239 U.S. 117
- 36 S. Ct. 32
- 60 L. Ed. 172
- 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1502
Syllabus
<p>The act prohibited by § 240, Criminal Code, making it punishable to ship or cause to be shipped from one State into another State or from a foreign country into a State, a package of intoxicating liquor not marked as required by the statute is essentially a continuing act the performance whereof is begun when the package is delivered to the carrier and completed when it reaches its destination.</p> <p>The word “ship” as used in § 240, Criminal Code, is not used in the sense of “deliver for shipment,” making the offense a completed one upon delivery of the goods.</p> <p>A criminal statute applicable alike to shipments in interstate and foreign commerce will not be so construed as to render it obviously futile as to foreign commerce; it should be so construed, if its words permit, as to cause it to reach both classes of shipments and to accomplish the object of its enactment.</p> <p>Section 240, Criminal Code, refers to the continuing act of shipping goods whereby the transportation into a State is accomplished, and the District Court within the State into which the goods are shipped has jurisdiction of the offense under §42, Judicial Code, as well as the District Court within the State from which the goods are shipped.</p>
Judges: Van Devanter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court· 1941-10-13· cited 2,081×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1944-12-18· cited 313×
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 219×
- Kentucky Whip & Collar Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court· 1937-01-04· cited 110×
- Ronzio v. Denver & R. G. W. R.Tenth Circuit· 1940-12-24· cited 72×
- United States v. Paul N. Hankish, and James L. MatthewsFourth Circuit· 1974-07-17· cited 69×
- United Fuel Gas Company v. BattleWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 34×
- Gregg v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1940-07-24· cited 26×
- Blumenthal v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1937-03-09· cited 26×
- Engs Motor Truck Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-02-11· cited 20×
- United States v. RodriguezS.D. California· 1960-03-29· cited 17×
- Jackson v. S. S. \Archimedes\Supreme Court· 1928-01-03· cited 16×
- United States v. Apex Distributing CompanyD. Rhode Island· 1957-01-18· cited 15×
- Gambino v. JacksonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1965-11-30· cited 10×
- State v. WarburtonWashington Supreme Court· 1917-07-16· cited 10×
- Eisler v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1949-04-18· cited 9×
- Export Leaf Tobacco Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-02-04· cited 8×
- United States v. PicouFifth Circuit· 1934-06-26· cited 5×
- United States v. JohnsonD. Delaware· 1944-01-26· cited 5×
- United States v. Union Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1916-04-03· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.