United States v. Freeland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff's case was not distinguishable from Fior-entino based on his being a veteran
• stating that \plaintiff may not base his theory of recovery on contract law since he was a federal employee\
• stating “the law is well settled that, ‘public employment does not, * * * give rise to a contractual relationship in the conventional sense’ ”
• government employees’ claims that are founded on contract principles are “moral, not legal”
• “Plaintiff may not base his theory of recovery on contract law since he was a federal employee.”
• “Plaintiff may not base his theory of recovery on contract law since he was a federal employee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).