Skip to main content
· 6/9/1995

United States v. Frederick Yazzie

Citations

  • 59 F.3d 807
  • 42 Fed. R. Serv. 29
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4311
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 7396
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14264
  • 1995 WL 341776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court’s evidentiary error harmless because of abundant, independent evidence includ- ing the victim’s detailed statements implicating the defen- dant
  • “In most circumstances, we believe that statements to a doctor by a parent of an injured child could easily qualify as a statement for the purpose of obtaining a proper medical diagnosis.”
  • in most circumstances, statements by parent of injured child to doctor will qualify
  • “[E]vidence of homosexuality can be extremely prejudicial . . . .”
  • “[E]vidence of homosexuality can be extremely prejudicial . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Choy, Farris, Brunetti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.