United States v. Frederick Douglas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that clarifying changes or amendments to the Guidelines operate retroactively, even if not designated as such by the Commission in § 1B1.10(c)
• relying on Stinson v. United States, 508 U.S. 36, 45-46 (1993) (Guidelines amendments to be taken at face value unless plainly erroneous or inconsistent with Guidelines provision they explain or amend)
• applying the binding nature of Guidelines to Guidelines amendments
• applying the binding nature of Guidelines to Guidelines amendments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).