United States v. Fred Shores, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that Bruton does not apply if the non-testifying co-defendant's statement is admissible as a nonhearsay statement under Fed. R. Civ. P. 801(d)(2)(E)
• observing that Bruton does not apply if the non-testifying co-defendant’s statement is admissible as a nonhearsay statement under Fed. R. Civ. P. 801(d)(2)(E)
• explaining that in order to be in furtherance of a conspiracy, a statement to a nonconspirator must be made for the purpose of inducing that person to join the conspiracy or to assist the conspiracy in accomplishing its objectives
• “We. have held, however, that the Bruton rule does not apply if the nontestifying co-defendant’s statement is admissible against the defendant under the co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(E

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).