United States v. Fred Lenn Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[Section 3500's] limitation has also been extended to prohibit the pretrial disclosure of the identity of government witnesses in the absence of a showing of reasonable necessity by the defense.\
• “[Section 3500’s] limitation has also been extended to prohibit the pretrial disclosure of the identity of government witnesses in the absence of a showing of 7 not subject to disclosure under Rule 16(a
• \Appellant's reliance on the Jencks Act as a pre-trial discovery - 20 - tool is completely misplaced. . . . [T]he Act specifically provides that no statement of a government witness is discoverable until the witness has testified on direct examination.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).