United States v. Frankie Otis Erwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing occupational restriction based on conduct other than that for which the defendant was convicted
• “[T]he district court is required to determine that without the prohibition [the defendant] will continue to engage in criminal conduct similar to that for which he was convicted.... ”
• \[T]he district court is required to determine that without the prohibition [the defendant] will continue to engage in criminal conduct similar to that for which he was convicted. . . .\
• “The district court, however, did not demonstrate that any relationship existed between commercial fishing and unlawful conduct similar to possession of ammunition.”
• applying 18 U.S.C. § 3563(b)(5)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).