United States v. Frank Steven Dorman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming rejection of nolo contendere plea because ruling “was not arbitrary or capricious”
• affirming rejection of nolo contendere plea because ruling “was not arbitrary or capricious”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).