United States v. Frank Russell, Eugene Van Aernam, John L. Dixon and Jack Murphy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that noncriminal conduct introduced to “negate the inference of criminal conduct is generally irrelevant” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Having failed to object to the prosecution’s [closing] argument at trial, defendant can succeed only if the remarks were so prejudicial that they constituted plain or fundamental error.”
• “‘[e]vidence of noncriminal conduct to negate the inference of criminal conduct is generally irrelevant’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).