United States v. Frank R. Alber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the dis- trict court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the defendant’s delay cast doubt upon the sincerity of his stated reason for withdrawal
• listing as a reason for rejecting the plea withdrawal motion that three months elapsed between the plea and the motion
• upholding denial of a plea withdrawal motion where the defendant “moved to withdraw his plea only after he realized that he was going to receive a heavier sentence than he expected”
• “Rule 11(f) [now Rule 11(b)(3)] requires the district court to satisfy itself that there is a factual basis for all elements of the offense charged before accepting a guilty plea.”
• “An indictment is sufficient if 2 18-10011 it contains the elements of the charged crime in adequate detail to inform the defendant of the charge and to enable him to plead double jeopardy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).