United States v. Frank M. Reed, Jr., and David L. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding an “insubstantial showing of ... specificity” where the defendant “did not request specific documents, but sought entire arson investigation files” on the theory that they would identify “certain others ... [who] might have been contemporaneously involved in other arson activities”
• court properly quashed subpoena seeking production of documents which would not have been admissible “under the limitations of Federal Rules of Evidence 803(8)(B)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).