United States v. Frank J. Petrini Meat Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that because the plaintiffs were informed each week, in advance, of the number of hours they would work the following week, this “controlled employment” was “contrary to the requirements of a ‘Belo’ contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).