United States v. Frank J. Cianciola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court properly granted a continuance when the Government inadvertently failed to timely provide discovery, as “the interests of justice in allowing defense counsel more time to prepare for trial outweighed the need for a speedy trial”
• holding that the district court properly granted a continuance when the Government inadvertently failed to timely provide discovery, as “the interests of justice in allowing defense counsel more time to prepare for trial outweighed the need for a speedy trial”
• holding that the district court properly granted a continuance when the Government inadvertently failed to timely provide discovery, as “the interests of justice in allowing defense counsel more time to prepare for trial outweighed the need for a speedy trial”
• district court rightly excluded delay caused by prosecutor’s inadvertent failure to mail a discovery response because it was neither in bad faith nor chronic
• district court rightly excluded delay caused by prosecutor’s inadvertent failure to mail a discovery response because it was neither in bad faith nor chronic
• district court rightly excluded delay caused by prosecutor’s inadvertent failure to mail a discovery response because it was neither in bad faith nor chronic

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).