United States v. Frank C. Doering, AKA Carl Marty Doering

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “a defendant’s mental and emotional condition is ... relevant to a sentencing determination_ under section 5K2.13’s diminished capacity exception”
• finding that \a defendant's mental and emotional condition is ... relevant to a sentencing determination.... under section 5K2.13's diminished capacity exception\
• finding error where the district court “at least in part” based its decision to depart upward “upon [the defendant’s] need for psychiatric treatment”
• because Congress directed the Sentencing Commission to consider \rehabilitation” and providing defendants with \needed ... medical care, or other correctional treatment,” the need for psychiatric assistance was not a factor overlooked by the Commission
• \A defendant's mental and emotional condition is only relevant to a sentencing determination (1) in the extraordinary case and (2) as provided in Chapter Five of the Guidelines.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).