United States v. Frank B. Breitkreutz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the admission of the judgment and commitment order for purposes of establishing the date and length of [a third party's] sentence was entirely proper and resulted in no unfair prejudice to the defendant\
• holding a judgment and commitment order admissible under Rule 803(8) as a public record even though it is inadmissible under Rule 803(22)
• reviewing for abuse of discretion the trial court‘s denial of the defendant‘s motion to grant appropriate relief based on allegations of post- indictment government misuse of the grand jury to ―‗lock-in‘ incriminating 207 testimony‖
• Rule 803(22) not applicable because the previous conviction of a third party was \not offered to prove a fact essential to sustain the judgment\
• Defense \ 'opened the door’ \ to evidence of drug ledgers when opening statement claimed that none of the searches had revealed any evidence linking defendant with charged co-conspirators
• anonymous statement held to be admissible where there was “ample circumstantial evidence” of a conspiracy involving the declarant and the defendant, and the statement was made in furtherance of that conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).