United States v. Frank Alper, United States of America v. Frank Alper Appeal of Stanley M. Greenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a supplemental jury charge was not unduly coercive because although it suggested jurors re-examine their views, it told them not to surrender their honest convictions
• “The evidence against him, though not as overwhelming as that against Alper, who played the leading role in this drama . . . , was clearly sufficient to withstand a motion for a judgment of acquittal and to sustain the jury’s verdict against Greenberg.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).