Skip to main content
· 5/25/1971

United States v. Frank Allen Blosser

Citations

  • 440 F.2d 697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • mail fraud prosecution was timely if a mailing in furtherance of the scheme occurred within the five years before the indictment even though the scheme to defraud was devised outside of the limitations period
  • mail fraud prosecution was timely if a mailing in furtherance of the scheme occurred within the five years before the indictment even though the scheme to defraud was devised outside of the limitations period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breitenstein, Seth, Holloway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.