United States v. Franco-Villagrana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Hate Crimes Prevention Act does not violate RFRA
• “Ordinarily, the purpose of an amicus brief is to assist the court in resolving issues of law by explaining or amplifying the issues the parties raised.”
• “violence is not a protected form of religious exercise”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).