United States v. Franco-Santiago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• insufficient evidence to show that defendant conspired to rob multiple banks, though sufficient evidence to show he conspired to rob one bank
• overruled in part on other grounds by Peralta v. Dillard, 14 744 F.3d 1076 (9th Cir. 2014)
• “[K]nowledge of the broader conspiracy’s existence is critical” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).