· 7/11/2014
United States v. Francisco Zayas
Citations
- 758 F.3d 986
- 2014 WL 3377797
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13177
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that discretion to 3 3’s Motion by assessing the relevance and proportionality of the proposed discovery. See generally Goodwin v. Dist. of Columbia, 2021 WL 1978795, at n.1 (D.D.C. May 18, 2021
- noting that discretion to 3 3’s Motion by assessing the relevance and proportionality of the proposed discovery. See generally Goodwin v. D.C., No. 21-cv-806, 2021 WL 1978795, at n.1 (D.D.C. May 18, 2021
- noting that discretion to order expedited discovery is “cabined by Rule 26(b)(1
- noting that discretion to order expedited discovery is “cabined by Rule 26(b)(1
- noting that discretion to order expedited discovery is “cabined by Rule 26(b)(1
- district court may rely on unobjected to factual allegations in the presentence report
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Murphy, Sippel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.