Skip to main content
· 7/11/2014

United States v. Francisco Zayas

Citations

  • 758 F.3d 986
  • 2014 WL 3377797
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that discretion to 3 3’s Motion by assessing the relevance and proportionality of the proposed discovery. See generally Goodwin v. Dist. of Columbia, 2021 WL 1978795, at n.1 (D.D.C. May 18, 2021
  • noting that discretion to 3 3’s Motion by assessing the relevance and proportionality of the proposed discovery. See generally Goodwin v. D.C., No. 21-cv-806, 2021 WL 1978795, at n.1 (D.D.C. May 18, 2021
  • noting that discretion to order expedited discovery is “cabined by Rule 26(b)(1
  • noting that discretion to order expedited discovery is “cabined by Rule 26(b)(1
  • noting that discretion to order expedited discovery is “cabined by Rule 26(b)(1
  • district court may rely on unobjected to factual allegations in the presentence report

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Murphy, Sippel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.