Skip to main content
· 1/28/1993

United States v. Francisco Rodriguez-Garcia

Citations

  • 983 F.2d 1563
  • 37 Fed. R. Serv. 1101
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 1309
  • 1993 WL 15209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that consent to search two vehicles and storage unit was not invalid because it was requested and given after invocation of Miranda rights
  • incriminating evidence may be admitted even though defendant consented to search after receiving Miranda warnings
  • Miranda warnings require that officers inform a suspect of the right to remain silent and to an attorney before initiating a custodial interrogation
  • \Every federal circuit court which has addressed the Miranda issue presented here has reached the conclusion that a consent to search is not an incriminating statement.\
  • pre-arrest surveillance revealed the locations searched pursuant to the consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Logan, Barrett, Seymour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.