United States v. Francisco Rodriguez Claudio, A/K/A Pito

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in assessing medical opinions an ALJ may properly 11 consider the level or frequency of treatment for allegedly disabling conditions over the course of 12 a claimant’s history of medical care
• reviewing for abuse of discretion district court's refusal to postpone sentencing to allow defendant's submission of live medical testimony
• “The idea that general safeguards against wide-ranging discovery like the Jencks Act and Rule 6 would be sufficient to justify a conviction on secret evidence is patently absurd.”
• “[T]here is no auto‐ matic right to present live testimony at sentencing … .”
• \[T]here is no automatic right to present live testimony at sentencing....\
• “[T]here is no automatic right to present live testimony at sentencing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).