United States v. Francisco Feliciano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that we may not revisit credibility determinations unless the testimony is incredible as a matter of law, meaning the witness could not have observed it or the testimony could under have occurred in the laws of nature
• stating in conducting sufficiency review, we will not revisit the question of witness credibility “unless it is incredible as a matter of law”
• affirming convictions for both felon in possession of a firearm and brandishing a firearm while acknowledging co-defendant testimony as being key to the adjudication, despite no presence of fingerprints, DNA, or other physical evidence
• “The jury has exclusive province over the credibility of witnesses . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).