United States v. Francis Schmitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a district court need not even “explicitly address” this type of generic argument
• “[BJecause an argument like Schmitz’s is a blanket challenge to the guideline rather than one tailored to his unique characteristics and circumstances, it is not one that the district judge must explicitly address.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).