United States v. Francis Larkin and Francis Bolduc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Congress authorized consecutive sentences under § 2113(d) and § 924(c) for armed bank robbery committed by use of a gun
• urging appointment of counsel for suspects during pre-indictment line ups, \notwithstanding the absence of constitutional compulsion\
• excluding proffered expert testimony, in part, because defendant's counsel had the opportunity at trial to discuss the potential hazards of eyewitness identification and cast doubt upon the witnesses' eyewitness identifications
• Sixth Amendment right to counsel did not attach at pre-indictment custodial lineup although counsel should have been provided anyway
• “[T]he right to counsel presumptively does not attach at pre-indictment lineups.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).