United States v. Francis E. Springfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that involuntary manslaughter under § 1112 is a “crime of violence” for purposes of § 924(c)(3)
• “[t]he court had discretion to resolve the problem of the sleeping juror. It considered carefully the testimony missed during the nap and found that it was insubstantial. We find no abuse of discretion in the method used to remedy the situation”
• “[t]he court had discretion to resolve the problem of the sleeping juror. It considered carefully the testimony missed during the nap and found that it was insubstantial. We find no abuse of discretion in the method used to remedy the situation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).