United States v. Francis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, in order to establish prejudice, a defendant must show “that the jury was unable to make an individualized guilt determination for each defendant”
• explaining that “cautionary instructions to the jury to consider the evidence separately are presumed to guard adequately against prejudice.” (quotation marks omitted)
• noting that Rule 1006 allows a District Court to admit summary evidence, where, in the court's discretion, it would be \inconvenient or unnecessarily time-consuming\ to review the full evidence
• “The district court minimized any possible prejudice by in- structing the jury to consider the evidence against [each defendant] separately.”
• “Rule 1006 allows the district court to admit . . . summaries as evidence [when], in the court’s discretion, it would be inconvenient or unnecessarily time- consuming to [review all of the writings, recordings, or photographs].”
• “Rule 1006 allows the district court to admit . . . summaries as evidence [when], in the court’s discretion, it would be inconvenient or unnecessarily time- consuming to [review all of the writings, recordings, or photographs].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).