United States v. Franchi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that continuous misstatement of the tax codes warrants an injunction in the interest of the tax-paying public
• falsifying an amount on a tax return is both “unreasonable” and “willful” conduct
• ordering preliminary injunction under § 7407 following hearing at which “[m]any witnesses also came forward during the four days of testimony to say that [defendant] had engaged in fraudulent and deceptive conduct in preparing their returns”
• “In an action for a statutory injunction, once a violation has been demonstrated, the moving party need only show that there is a reasonable likelihood of future violations in order to obtain relief.” (citing United States v. Kaun, 827 F.2d 1144, 1148 (7th Cir. 1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).