United States v. Frances King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a district court’s ability to “[a]dopt[] . . . the order [of a magistrate judge] obviates the need for the district court to prepare its own written findings of fact and statement of reasons supporting” the order
• affirming detention order in face of argument that defendant knew of pending indictment six months before it was returned
• based upon the legislative history to the Act, “dangerousness” is not limited only to physical harm or injury
• a finding of either danger to the community or risk of flight will be sufficient to detain the defendant pending trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).