United States v. Fraire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding checkpoint stops are constitutional if they are not used as crime control devices and are employed reasonably
• holding a similar type of checkpoint station was not unconstitutional
• “[T]he court must determine whether the primary purpose of the checkpoint was to advance the general interest in crime control. If so, theri the stop is per se invalid under the Fourth Amendment.” (internal citations, quotation marks, and alterations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).