Skip to main content
· 7/11/1996

United States v. Foxman

Citations

  • 87 F.3d 1220
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 16630
  • 1996 WL 346577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “intentional government acts designed to obtain a tactical advantage which only incidentally cause delay have never been ruled out as a potential basis for 14 he points to three pieces of evidence no longer available to him allegedly due to the delay: (1) the SUV, (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Fay, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.