D. Maine· 2/25/2010
United States v. Fortson
Citations
- 688 F. Supp. 2d 12
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17181
- 2010 WL 675056
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he Supreme Court has indicated that ‘dog sniffs’ during otherwise lawful traffic stops do not violate the Fourth Amendment”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: George Z. Singal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
- Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2009-01-26· cited 1,709×
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 1,555×
- United States v. Fernandez-VenturaFirst Circuit· 1996-05-30· cited 78×
- United States v. TeemerFirst Circuit· 2005-01-12· cited 53×
- United States v. GenaoFirst Circuit· 2002-02-27· cited 44×
- United States v. JacksonFirst Circuit· 2008-10-08· cited 22×
Other cases named United States v. Fortson
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.