Skip to main content
· 6/20/2007

United States v. Foerster

Citations

  • 65 M.J. 120
  • 2007 CAAF LEXIS 778
  • 2007 WL 1791253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a third-party affidavit was both nontestimonial and a business record where (1
  • holding that a third-party affidavit was both nontesti-monial and a business record where (1) it was “made at the behest of [the bank],” (2) it “cataloged] objective facts,” and (3) its primary purpose was “preventing fraud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, Effron, Baker, Erdmann, Stucky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.