United States v. Florida Pine & Cypress Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• posting notice in the workplace is common, helps maximize potential plaintiffs’ ability to be informed, and is not unduly disruptive
• rejecting a defendant-employer’s challenge to posting notice in the workplace as duplicative of mailing notice
• rejecting defendants’ request to strike anti-retaliation language because “there [was] no evidence of retaliation,” and affirming the appropriateness of a “statement concerning the prohibition on retaliation”
• “[P]osting notice in the workplace maximizes potential plaintiffs’ opportunities to be informed of the pendency of the litigation and consider whether to opt in.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• \A United States magistrate Judge has the authority to rule on a motion to authorize a collective action.\
• “A United States magistrate Judge has the authority to rule on a motion to authorize a collective action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).