United States v. Flores-Chapa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• overturning conviction where prosecutor had repeated hearsay testimony at closing argument, despite two previously sustained objections to testimony at trial
• “Proof of constructive possession is sufficient; thus, any showing that the defendant exercised ownership, dominion, or control of the drugs, or of the premises on which they are found, will suffice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).