United States v. Flores-Blanco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Rule 404(b) evidence of prior act that occurred approximately two years before the charged offenses was not too remote in time
• blanket invocation allowed where the witness, a co-defendant, was expected to testify that the defendant had nothing to do with the crime
• “The testimony of the border patrol agents who apprehended [defendant] on the prior occasions was sufficient to support a jury finding that [defendant] committed the alleged prior acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).