Skip to main content
· 3/21/1960

United States v. Floersch

Citations

  • 276 F.2d 714

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that preliminary injunction under section 6 of the Consumer Fraud Act is justified by the potential for harm to the public pending disposition of the underlying suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huxman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.