Skip to main content
· 7/30/1993

United States v. F.J. Vollmer & Company, Inc., and Kenneth L. Nevius

Citations

  • 1 F.3d 1511
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19747
  • 1993 WL 286198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \[t]he right to poll a jury is a substantial right\ guaranteed by Rule 31(d) and that \[f]ailure to poll a jury upon a timely request is per se error requiring reversal\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • finding that the question of jurisdiction is one of law “and a department or agency has jurisdiction only when it has the power to exercise authority in a particular situa- tion”
  • “[djenial of a timely request for a poll under Rule 31 (d) is reversible error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Cudahy, Eschbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.