· 2/22/2013
United States v. Fiume
Citations
- 708 F.3d 59
- 2013 WL 646484
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3777
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Given the Commission’s proclivity for indicating when double counting is forbidden, we-are reluctant to infer further such instances out of thin air.”
- reviewing a double-counting claim de novo
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch, Souter, Selya
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.