Skip to main content
· 2/22/2013

United States v. Fiume

Citations

  • 708 F.3d 59
  • 2013 WL 646484
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3777

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Given the Commission’s proclivity for indicating when double counting is forbidden, we-are reluctant to infer further such instances out of thin air.”
  • reviewing a double-counting claim de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Souter, Selya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.