United States v. Finau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a gap of less than two months between the protected activity and the plaintiff’s termination was sufficient
• holding that plaintiff failed to make out a prima facie case for retaliation on motion for summary judgment where defendant “had taken steps to discharge” plaintiff before plaintiff engaged in protected activity
• holding a party opposing summary judgment may not create a triable issue of fact by affidavit that disputes previous testimony
• finding that plaintiff’s inability to “get along” with co- workers and “disruptive conduct” were legitimate reasons for termination
• finding that “a complaint about disability-related discrimination cannot form the basis of a retaliation claim under Title VII”
• explaining that adverse actions that “occurred prior to [the plaintiff’s] protected activity . . . cannot be considered retaliatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).