United States v. Filimon Sandoval-Gomez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidence was sufficient for jury to find that defendant intentionally had reentered country without permission where he admitted orally and in No. 11‐2667 Page 3 writing that he came back “illegally” and knew he should not have returned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).