United States v. Fields

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an evidentiary hearing was unnecessary where, despite disputes of fact regarding counsels’ performance, there were no disputes related to prejudice to the petitioner
• “[R]elief under § 2255 is generally confined to situations where (a) the convictions and sentences were entered by a court without jurisdiction, (b) the sentence imposed was outside of the statutory limits, (c) a constitutional error occurred, or (d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• NOLEN v. STATE
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2021-03-18· cited 4×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Kimmelman v. Morrison
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 3,502×
• MacHibroda v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 1,618×
• United States v. Addonizio
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,450×
• Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, Superintendent
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-05-12· cited 516×
• Foster v. Chatman
  Supreme Court· 2016-05-23· cited 461×
• Hooks v. Workman
  Tenth Circuit· 2012-08-03· cited 270×
• Anderson v. Sirmons
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-02-21· cited 140×
• Smith v. Mullin
  Tenth Circuit· 2004-07-29· cited 126×
• Sandoval v. Calderon
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-11-06· cited 106×
• United States v. Herring
  Tenth Circuit· 2019-08-27· cited 79×
• United States v. Fields
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-02-25· cited 71×
• Kay v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 2009-04-06· cited 28×
• United States v. Sanders
  Tenth Circuit· 2004-06-21· cited 10×