United States v. Fields

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that a sufficient showing of relevancy and specificity would “warrant in camera production to the district court for possible release after the evidentiary requirement had been met,” but declining to decide whether the defendant had made such a showing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• United States v. Reyes
  N.D. California· 2006-12-22· cited 8×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Nixon
  Supreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 4,095×
• Upjohn Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 3,227×
• United States v. Cuthbertson, Gerald M. Appeal of Cbs Inc., Third Party Witness
  Third Circuit· 1980-07-23· cited 198×
• Peister v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-26· cited 122×
• United States v. Cuthbertson
  Third Circuit· 1981-05-29· cited 69×
• United States v. Fields
  Ninth Circuit· 1981-11-25· cited 7×