United States v. Fibre Making Processes, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in impos- ing consecutive sentences based on ORS 137.123(5)(a) and noting that the trial court could address ORS 137.123(5)(b) during resentencing
• “We decline to exercise our discretion to address [the] defendant’s unpreserved merger claim. The trial court may resolve that issue on remand.”
• “Because the record lacks any discrete facts evincing defendant’s will- ingness to commit more than one criminal offense, the trial court erred in relying on ORS 137.123(5)(a) to impose a con- secutive term of imprisonment for Counts 2 and 3.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).