United States v. Ferreras

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “vigorously asserting [one’s] rights” under the ADA and 10 other state and federal discrimination laws constitutes protected activity
• holding that an attic was included in a search warrant for the building’s second floor because it was connected to the second floor apartment, lacked an exit to the street, and was “not equipped for independent living”
• affirming denial of motion to suppress evidence found in an attic when search warrant specified only the second-floor apartment because the attic was found to be a part of the apartment
• a party charged with constitutional deprivation must be a governmental actor 10 because “§ 1983 excludes from its reach merely private conduct, no matter how discriminatory or 11 wrong”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).